Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Question EH rated, now ARC rated line boots?

    Our company is in the process of writing new policy on our line boots. It started out that an EH rating would be required. Now, they are talking about an Arc, or Flash rating too! Personally I think it is a little over kill. What is required at your companies?
    From what I can tell they are reading into the regs on Clothing, not footwear. No Nylon, Rayon, etc. allowed on the boot? Leather only. I have'nt heard of there being a rash of accidents where the lineman's boots were melted to there feet in a flash, but what do I know!
    What sucks is our boot allowance is 100 bucs a year.

  2. #2

    Default

    I have never heard of an arc flash boot. Google did not turn up anything.
    You could ask over here http://www.arcflashforum.com/index.php.

  3. #3

    Default

    No such thing as arc rated boots, they don't exist.

    I also think EH (Electrical Hazard) rated boots are a waste of money for utility line workers also. EH insulation protection is only good for low voltages up to 600V. They are intended for use by commercial/industrial electricians. If you need insulation for protection from step potentials then you need 10 or 20kV rated dielectric overshoes.
    I don't give em hell, I just tell the truth and they think it is Hell! - Truman

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wudwlkr View Post
    No such thing as arc rated boots, they don't exist.

    I also think EH (Electrical Hazard) rated boots are a waste of money for utility line workers also. EH insulation protection is only good for low voltages up to 600V. They are intended for use by commercial/industrial electricians. If you need insulation for protection from step potentials then you need 10 or 20kV rated dielectric overshoes.
    Here's the ANSI standard for EH rating:

    Electrical hazard (EH) footwear is manufactured with non-conductive electrical shock resistant soles and heals. It is intended to provide a secondary source of protection against accidental contact with live electrical circuits, electrically energized conductors, parts or apparatus. It must be capable of withstanding the application of 14,000 volts at 60 hertz for one minute with no current flow or leakage current in excess of 3.0 milliamperes, under dry conditions.

    So theoretically, it should be good for some primary voltages, when new. With that said, I wouldn't trust it over 480V after walking around in a metal strewn environment for months. And, since they are not 100% waterproof, I don't know how you would do regular dielectric testing on the boots. I'm sure the initial test only covers the sole and heel. At primary voltages, wet grass touching the leather part of the shoe could be game over.

    As far as arc rating goes, leather is usually considered sufficient for arc protection. That's why rubber with leather cover-ups don't have any further arc rating or requirement.


    Mark
    Last edited by busman; 02-25-2011 at 09:56 AM.

  5. #5

    Default

    I understand the EH rating on boots and over-shoes for step potential.
    I am just not sold on Leather only for line boots because of Flash potential.
    If you are involved in a flash of that magnitude where your boots melt to your feet, wouldn't your fall arrest (that we also have just emplemented) like the Jelco, or Buck Squeeze be in jeopardy also? They also are made of synthetic material. I would imagine that if it was hot enough to melt your boots to your feet, it would melt your fall arrest, sending you to the ground!
    Are we really solving a Safety Issue here?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hotwiretamer View Post
    I understand the EH rating on boots and over-shoes for step potential.
    I am just not sold on Leather only for line boots because of Flash potential.
    If you are involved in a flash of that magnitude where your boots melt to your feet, wouldn't your fall arrest (that we also have just emplemented) like the Jelco, or Buck Squeeze be in jeopardy also? They also are made of synthetic material. I would imagine that if it was hot enough to melt your boots to your feet, it would melt your fall arrest, sending you to the ground!
    Are we really solving a Safety Issue here?
    My understanding is that it's not so much about instant melting of the fabric to the feet. It's more about the instantaneous igniting of the fabric and its then continuing to burn. Things like leather do not ignite, so the flash is all there is. I would agree that the new synthetic climbing devices would go up like Christmas trees in an arc flash.

    Mark

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by busman View Post
    Here's the ANSI standard for EH rating:

    Electrical hazard (EH) footwear is manufactured with non-conductive electrical shock resistant soles and heals. It is intended to provide a secondary source of protection against accidental contact with live electrical circuits, electrically energized conductors, parts or apparatus. It must be capable of withstanding the application of 14,000 volts at 60 hertz for one minute with no current flow or leakage current in excess of 3.0 milliamperes, under dry conditions.

    So theoretically, it should be good for some primary voltages, when new. With that said, I wouldn't trust it over 480V after walking around in a metal strewn environment for months. And, since they are not 100% waterproof, I don't know how you would do regular dielectric testing on the boots. I'm sure the initial test only covers the sole and heel. At primary voltages, wet grass touching the leather part of the shoe could be game over.

    As far as arc rating goes, leather is usually considered sufficient for arc protection. That's why rubber with leather cover-ups don't have any further arc rating or requirement.
    Yes, the sole is tested to 14kV. But the sole is what, 1/4 of an inch thick or so? The sides of the boot are not insulated so primary voltage will very easily jump across that short a distance from the edge of the foot to ground. For real protection you are limited to low voltages with EH boots. And you are absolutely right about wearing them in wet, dirty conditions. Game over.
    I don't give em hell, I just tell the truth and they think it is Hell! - Truman

  8. #8

    Default

    Thanks for the input. Again, the EH rating I get. More than likely we will have overshoes available for wet conditions.
    Has there been a rash of accidents involving line boots that has increased injury in a flash because of the materials used in the boot?

  9. Default Canadian Standard boots

    Our company requires Di-electric footwear that has been rated to the Canadian Standard, which is 18,000 volts. Some of our service territory is 25kv. It severely limits your options on which boots you can buy. All of the more well known Lineman boot makers offer the EH rated boots, i.e. Hoffman, Wesco, White, Danner. Redwing makes a couple as does Halls. But that's about it. I did find a company that makes a winter boot to the Canadian standard. Baffin. They seem to be fairly well constructed. We don't have a lot of need for the cold weather one like some of you here. I have a nice pair of Hoffmans that I purchased in 1994 and they still do the trick. Just can't wear them any longer due to the new company rules.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    1,284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lineman8641 View Post
    Our company requires Di-electric footwear that has been rated to the Canadian Standard, which is 18,000 volts. Some of our service territory is 25kv. It severely limits your options on which boots you can buy. All of the more well known Lineman boot makers offer the EH rated boots, i.e. Hoffman, Wesco, White, Danner. Redwing makes a couple as does Halls. But that's about it. I did find a company that makes a winter boot to the Canadian standard. Baffin. They seem to be fairly well constructed. We don't have a lot of need for the cold weather one like some of you here. I have a nice pair of Hoffmans that I purchased in 1994 and they still do the trick. Just can't wear them any longer due to the new company rules.
    Which is great until they get wet or you sweat in them, basically out of the box until you wear them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •