View Full Version : super tuesday
loner
03-03-2008, 10:19 PM
cross your fingers but dont hold your breath,maybe after tomorrow we can start singing,ding dong the bitch is dead the blonde old bitch renos bitch.ding dong hillary bit the dust.probably wishfull thinking,the clintons will pull something ,short of murder(vince foster)
topgroove
03-03-2008, 10:38 PM
I hear that... looks like she will win ohio,even though nafta has cost that state thousands of manufacturing jobs. a bill she supported.
loner
03-03-2008, 11:13 PM
no experience? what do you call a state senator? thats all hillary is ,what experience does she have that obama doesnt.
loner
03-04-2008, 12:41 AM
well,i really wouldnt put money on her sleeping with bill,at least not in the same bed.hillary has said that her health care pan would cover everyone,and she would take the appropriate amount of your pay based on a percentage to pay for it.instead of socialism lets call it communism.
tolex42
03-04-2008, 12:08 PM
no experience? what do you call a state senator? thats all hillary is ,what experience does she have that obama doesnt.
You and Swamprat show your ignorance, both Clinton and Obama are U.S. Senators, not state senators. BIG DIFFERENCE!
loner
03-04-2008, 06:36 PM
did a google on obama it says he is a us senator for the state of illinois,so doesnt he in fact represent illinois when he is on the senate floor. still no draft which was guarenteed to be reinstated.hey ****head ,how about a guarantee about obama.
PA BEN
03-04-2008, 07:54 PM
Well blame this on the Clinton's you morons
New Presidential Helicopters built by France and Britain. New Air Force Fuel Tankers built by France and 105 Howitzer's built by England.
That was all done under bush's watch to get some backing for his little war.
Foreign countries supply the killing hardware and we supply the body's. So blame the democratic about jobs going overseas. You better wake up. The US is for SALE and it was the republicans that sold it.
Bill Clinton's administration brought in NAFTA. And the last time I looked NAFTA took jobs from the USA and took them over seas.:cool:
BigClive
03-05-2008, 12:53 PM
So what happened then?
PA BEN
03-05-2008, 07:50 PM
If you would check your facts, NAFTA was started and pushed through by bush one and and forced on Clinton by a republican controlled house and Clinton should have vetoed it and did not. WHY??? I HAVEN'T A CLUE.
You can't blame NAFTA for letting government contracts to foreign governments. You can only blame the present administration. Why is our government buying foreign products and weapons with federal tax dollars?? Because bush and chaney sold you out.
Your right Clinton should have used has BALLS and vetoed it. But he chose to use them on Monika instead. I agree, government contracts should stay in the USA. Congress could stop funding this.
wtdoor67
03-06-2008, 01:06 PM
news, the DNC can pay for a redo of the Dem. primary election,or they can ask the Florida state govt. to pay for it. Now with a Repub. Gov. and a Repub. controlled state congress, who do you think will pay?
duckhunter
03-10-2008, 12:48 PM
Here in Michigan, the worst economy in the nation, they are talking redo. Who do you suppose our Democrat Gov. will think should pay for it? Although, she is looking for a cabinet position in the Clinton Administration and Hillary was the only Dem on our ballot.
Orgnizdlbr
03-12-2008, 03:36 PM
It is my understanding that the Florida legislature introduced, voted for the measure to change the date of the primary, then the "bill" was signed by the governor of the state. So, that begs the question, who controls the legislature of the state? If it is Democrats, shame on them, if Republicans and the Dems had no veto recourse, it becomes a little different story.
Could it be possible that the republicans forsaw the conundrum they were putting the dems in? I dont know, and any opinion on my part would be pure conjecture. I find it hard to believe that a member of any state legislature would attempt to enact legislation that would, in essence, take their constituents right to have their vote counted and mean something in a primary away. That would be political suicide and thwart the democratic process. Maybe I'm not cynical enough concerning this issue........
Orgnizdlbr
03-12-2008, 05:47 PM
Well then shame on the fla dems. The problem is what to do going forward, to count or not to count, redo or not redo. I know if I voted, and my vote was cancelled out by the legislature, I'd be pissed. The fla dems were advised by the DNC that the rules would be followed and that the primary would not be counted if it took place before a certain date. If they did nothing about it, shame on them, and I hope the voters in fla remember the next election cycle.......
topgroove
03-12-2008, 10:05 PM
The legislature in Florida is controlled by Republicans Labor, but I can't in my Wildest Dreams, Think the Democrats wouldn't have put up a HOWLING FIT that would have been ALL Over the papers and the News here in Florida if they haden't agreed with it.
I never heard a thing. AND, I don't hear them complaining or blaming the Republicans nowdays, that this was Jammed down their throat. And you KNOW they would be!!!;)
The Florida House passed (118-0) and sent to the governor a plan to move the state's 2008 presidential primary to Jan. 29, bypassing a dozen other states that have set their primaries to Feb. 5. The democratic leaders voting for HRC are trying to say it was the Republicans fault that the primary was moved but as you can see... NONE OF THEM VOTED AGAINST IT. If they HAD voted NO, I would argue that they were forced to move the primary and they shouldnt be penalized. But they CHOSE to do it. So they have to DEAL with it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.