johnnyhighliner
04-25-2009, 08:02 PM
I Throw This Question Up This Evening Seeking Answers From The Union Contingency To The Threads Questions. I Ask This Since Locals 499's And 109's Contract Was Settled And The Last Two Contracts Had Major Issues I.e. Benefits Decided By Age Not By Seniority.
This Also Occurred At Our Sister Company Pacificorp, Where Their Pensions Were Frozen For People That Were 52 Years Of Age And Younger.
The Contract Before This One Where Locals 499 & 109 Bought To The Table And Passed Had Grave Consequences For People Under 50. We Were Given A R.m.a. Account. It Stands For Retiree Medical Account. That Is The Company Would Give You So Much $$$ Per Year For Your First 10 Years Of Service. And After Signage Of The Contract The Company Would Start Contributing To The Rma Account. These Actions Were Based On Age Not Seniority.
So Not To Get Too Long Winded.
If It Comes Down To Layoffs In A Union Shop Should It Be Decided By Seniority Or Should It Be Decided By Age?
If It Comes Down To Benefits Should The Local Unions Leadership Base Who Gets Them Either By Age Or Seniority.
You See It Appears The Unions In Particular Are Eating Their Cake And Icing As Well.
They Want The Best Of Both Worlds. I Was Always Under The Assumption Seniority Prevailed.
Seniority Allows You To Get These Right Now At Local 499 &109 Wondering If Age Will Factor In On These.
1. Seniority Yrs Of Service Not Age Gives You So Many Weeks Of Vacation Union Earned Vacation Negotiated.
2. Bidding A Job I.e. Apprenticeships: Awarding Of Job Based On Seniority Not Age. Should It Be By Age. Since Local 499 & 109 Decided Benefits , Medical And Pensions By Age Not Seniority
You See I Am Beginning To See A Double Standard Here. You May Have Years Of Seniority That Entitles You To Certain Things But Are Not Entitled To Having Pension Or Medical Due To Your Age. But You Have Paid Dues For Years. Go Figure!!!!!!!!!!
3.IF IT COMES DOWN TO LAYOFFS AT A COMPANY ANY UNION COMPANY, IT COMES DOWN TO SENIORITY WHO IS OUT OF WORK. WHY NOT DETERMINE IT BY AGE. THAT IS, THE YOUNGEST STAY WORKING, WHILE THE OLDEST HIT THE BRICKS, AND IT WOULDN'T BE BASED ON SENIORITY.
WOULD THEIR BE A GREAT UPROAR FROM THE ELDER STATESMAN IF THIS WAS ALLOWED TO OCCUR, THEN WHY NOT THE OUTRAGE OF WHAT IS GOING ON TODAY.
Please Chime In If You Care To
This Also Occurred At Our Sister Company Pacificorp, Where Their Pensions Were Frozen For People That Were 52 Years Of Age And Younger.
The Contract Before This One Where Locals 499 & 109 Bought To The Table And Passed Had Grave Consequences For People Under 50. We Were Given A R.m.a. Account. It Stands For Retiree Medical Account. That Is The Company Would Give You So Much $$$ Per Year For Your First 10 Years Of Service. And After Signage Of The Contract The Company Would Start Contributing To The Rma Account. These Actions Were Based On Age Not Seniority.
So Not To Get Too Long Winded.
If It Comes Down To Layoffs In A Union Shop Should It Be Decided By Seniority Or Should It Be Decided By Age?
If It Comes Down To Benefits Should The Local Unions Leadership Base Who Gets Them Either By Age Or Seniority.
You See It Appears The Unions In Particular Are Eating Their Cake And Icing As Well.
They Want The Best Of Both Worlds. I Was Always Under The Assumption Seniority Prevailed.
Seniority Allows You To Get These Right Now At Local 499 &109 Wondering If Age Will Factor In On These.
1. Seniority Yrs Of Service Not Age Gives You So Many Weeks Of Vacation Union Earned Vacation Negotiated.
2. Bidding A Job I.e. Apprenticeships: Awarding Of Job Based On Seniority Not Age. Should It Be By Age. Since Local 499 & 109 Decided Benefits , Medical And Pensions By Age Not Seniority
You See I Am Beginning To See A Double Standard Here. You May Have Years Of Seniority That Entitles You To Certain Things But Are Not Entitled To Having Pension Or Medical Due To Your Age. But You Have Paid Dues For Years. Go Figure!!!!!!!!!!
3.IF IT COMES DOWN TO LAYOFFS AT A COMPANY ANY UNION COMPANY, IT COMES DOWN TO SENIORITY WHO IS OUT OF WORK. WHY NOT DETERMINE IT BY AGE. THAT IS, THE YOUNGEST STAY WORKING, WHILE THE OLDEST HIT THE BRICKS, AND IT WOULDN'T BE BASED ON SENIORITY.
WOULD THEIR BE A GREAT UPROAR FROM THE ELDER STATESMAN IF THIS WAS ALLOWED TO OCCUR, THEN WHY NOT THE OUTRAGE OF WHAT IS GOING ON TODAY.
Please Chime In If You Care To