Results 1 to 10 of 12

Hybrid View

  1. Default Question about pole-mounted transformers

    Hello all. I am not a lineman, nor do I work in the electrical generation or transmission industry. I have a quick question about best practices for the mounting of transformers on wooden poles and I need the opinion of professionals such as your selves.

    At our place of business we expanded a machine shop approximately 18 months ago. An additional power entrance to the building was constructed by our sub contractor that consisted of several poles and 3 pole-mounted transformers. Being an extension of service on our property this additional entrance and its equipment is owned by us and not the electrical infrastructure provider.

    Yesterday we arrived to find that we had lost 1 leg of 3 phase power over the weekend. We called the sub contractor that installed these facilities and they found the issue was that the entire assembly of 3 transformers and their mounting bracket (friction bracket) had slid down 10-14 inches and pulled one of the transformer's feeds from the primary electrode (see pictures).

    My question is about best practices. Being unable to assure the exact diameter of the wooden pole, I find it odd that a lynch pin of sort was not used to assure zero movement of the transformers and their bracket. Is my installation "normal" or should there be some method to positively keep the entire assembly from movement due to gravity?

    Thanks for reading - I do appreciate it.

    Robert
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  2. #2

    Default

    That cluster mount is what we call a banded cluster mount , we have used some of them years ago on 3 pot banks where the transformers were above 167 kva , I have never seen a properly installed cluster bracket slide down the pole , I suspect the bolts were not tightened enough which let it slide down a little , if that's what happened, the stinger coming from the cutout might not have been tight in the high side bushing of the pot and the load finally caused it to burn off, hard to say for sure just looking at pictures.

  3. #3

    Default

    After looking at the pictures again as tight as the other stinger is on the other outside pot, I do believe the whole aluminum cluster bracket holding the 3 transformers did slide some down the pole.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lineman North Florida View Post
    After looking at the pictures again as tight as the other stinger is on the other outside pot, I do believe the whole aluminum cluster bracket holding the 3 transformers did slide some down the pole.
    Thank you for the response - I do appreciate it.

    I googled "transformer banded cluster mount" and found lots of pictures. All appear to have smooth interior surfaces where they contact the pole (so no teeth or anything similar to get a bite into the pole). Is it accurate to say all of these relay only on the friction surface between the inside of the bracket and the pole surface for "staying put"? (and of course why having it tightened properly is so important).

    Robert

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    2,512
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I have used similar “Cluster Mount” brackets over the years. The type I’ve used had holes in the channels used to lag the bracket to the pole in conjunction with the mounting bolts to hold the bracket in place. The lags are not meant to carry the weight of the transforms, they’re just for additional stability. 43 years in the business, and I’ve never seen a bank of transformers slide down like that. Those bolts couldn’t be tightened properly.

    my question, how did they rectify your issue?
    "It is not the critic who counts:The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena" Teddy Roosevelt

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cmoschip View Post
    Thank you for the response - I do appreciate it.

    I googled "transformer banded cluster mount" and found lots of pictures. All appear to have smooth interior surfaces where they contact the pole (so no teeth or anything similar to get a bite into the pole). Is it accurate to say all of these relay only on the friction surface between the inside of the bracket and the pole surface for "staying put"? (and of course why having it tightened properly is so important).

    Robert
    Yes that is why it is important for those bolts to be tightened properly, I am also guessing that the reason that they went with a banded cluster is the weight of the transformers, they look like 250 KVA pots, if so you probably have about 5,000+ lbs on that cluster bracket and a lot of people always said that every hole you bored in a pole in that area where the cluster is weakens the pole strength, so it always made sense to me, I'm gonna guess that they tightened the bolts and extended the stingers coming to the top of the transformers and let her stay right where she settled. Charlie.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lineman North Florida View Post
    Yes that is why it is important for those bolts to be tightened properly, I am also guessing that the reason that they went with a banded cluster is the weight of the transformers, they look like 250 KVA pots, if so you probably have about 5,000+ lbs on that cluster bracket and a lot of people always said that every hole you bored in a pole in that area where the cluster is weakens the pole strength, so it always made sense to me, I'm gonna guess that they tightened the bolts and extended the stingers coming to the top of the transformers and let her stay right where she settled. Charlie.
    Exactly - tightened and added a "jumper" to the high voltage leads (sorry my syntax is likley not accurate) to extend them slightly. They originally planned to come back at a later date and replace the leads entirely but now say it "ok" like it is (with the extension). That's a different issue possibly.....

    I do thank you all for giving me this feedback - it will be supportive for me when dispute the "fix" of this error - especially since it was just under 18 months old. If we had been 10 years down the road I might be persuaded to believe moisture had left the pole, etc and it *might* be slightly smaller in diamter. I think you all are correct and it was not tightened sufficiently

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •